Frustrated Tenancies: Impossibility of Continued Occupancy | Case in Point Paralegal Services
Helpful?
Yes No Share to Facebook

Frustrated Tenancies:

Impossibility of Continued Occupancy



Last Updated: July 02 2026

Question: When a residential unit in Ontario is declared uninhabitable or occupancy is prohibited due to a fire, major flood, or condemnation, how do I know if my lease is “frustrated” and what options do I have as a tenant to protect my rights?

Answer: Case in Point Paralegal Services can help you understand whether the doctrine of frustration (and the related legal consequence that termination can occur by operation of law) likely applies under section 19 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 when unforeseen outside events make the unit impossible to occupy, including situations like municipal condemnation orders where occupancy is prohibited; if frustration applies, the tenancy relationship can end and tenant “security of tenure” rights such as a first right of refusal to return after repairs may not be available, but if the landlord can realistically complete repairs within a reasonable time the tenancy may not be frustrated and you may still have return rights depending on the facts; for a practical next step, gather the order or municipal notice, repair timelines, and your tenancy documents, then get advice promptly so you can choose the right course of action and preserve any available remedies, call (519) 318-7843 for paralegal support across Ontario.

Understanding When the Doctrine of Frustration Applies to a Residential Tenancy and What Recourse Does a Tenant Have?

Frustrated Tenancies: Impossibility of Continued OccupancyCertain events, such as a major fire, flood or serious water damage, tornado or windstorm, or some other unforeseen circumstances, including changes in law, may arise with the result being that occupancy of the residential premises becomes impossible.  When the tenancy becomes impossible due to an unforeseeable outside force, sometimes called a force majeure event, the contractual obligations of both the landlord and the tenant, whether during a lease period or after the tenure converts to a month-to-month, are deemed frustrated and the tenancy arrangements come to an end as per section 19 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, Chapter 17 where it is said:


19 The doctrine of frustration of contract and the Frustrated Contracts Act apply with respect to tenancy agreements.

Condemnation

Sometimes a rental unit becomes unoccupiable due to an order issued by the local municipality that condemns the premises. This type of situation occurred and was the issue within the case of AS v. CJMTSL-05808-10 (Re), 2010 CanLII 58985 where it was said:


1.  At the hearing before me the parties filed an order dated September 27, 2010 issued by the City of Toronto that says the residential complex is unsafe and that occupancy of the rental unit is prohibited.

2.  As I explained at the hearing section 19 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the ‘Act’) says: “The doctrine of frustration of contract and the Frustrated Contracts Act apply with respect to tenancy agreements.” Essentially the doctrine of frustration says that when a contract becomes impossible of performance, then the contract has come to an end.  As the doctrine applies to residential tenancy agreements what this means is that when a residential complex cannot be physically lived in anymore because it has been condemned, the tenancy has come to an end by operation of law.

3.  As a result, an order will issue declaring the tenancy termination by operation of the doctrine of frustration.

Accordingly, and apparently, despite that premises may become condemned due to the neglect of the landlord, as a matter of law, frustration of the tenancy agreement, and thereby termination of the tenancy agreement with corresponding termination of the tenancy, results when the premises are officially condemned.

Ceasing of Security of Tenure

Where a tenancy agreement is deemed frustrated, such as in circumstances where a fire requires restorative work that will be extensive and take considerable time, the security of tenure, including first right of refusal to return following restorative work, is absent.  Only where the restorative work can be done in a reasonable amount of time will the tenancy agreement be without frustration and therefore with security of tenure protected as per the case of Y.Y. v. A.T. and L.W., TEL-32649-12 (Re), 2013 CanLII 51226 where it was said:


1.  The Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 did apply to this unit from June 1, 2012 until December 1, 2012.  At that time the unit was deemed uninhabitable and the tenancy agreement became frustrated pursuant to the Frustrated Contracts Act and as permitted under section 19 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (RTA).

2.  As a result of the lengthy period of time required to make repairs to the unit there is no foreseeable date that the Tenants would be permitted back into the rental unit.  There is no requirement under the RTA for the Landlord to offer the Tenants first right of refusal when the unit does become habitable.

3.  Based on the evidence provided and the fact this vacancy of the rental unit is not for a short period of time I have deemed the rental contract to be frustrated as of December 1, 2012.

Summary Comment

When a serious force majeure event occurs, rendering the premises unoccupiable for an unforeseeable length of time, the tenancy agreement, whether within a lease period or month-to-month period, becomes frustrated and all obligations cease including the security of tenure usually enjoyed by the tenant.

At
Our Desk Now!
Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

NOTE: Do not send confidential information through the web form.  Use the web form only for your introduction.   Learn Why?
7

NOTE: A significant amount of online searches for “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” often indicate a demand for prompt and skilled legal assistance rather than an explicit job title.  In Ontario, licensed paralegals fall under the oversight of the same Law Society that governs lawyers and are permitted to advocate for clients in specific litigation contexts.  Core to this position are advocacy, legal reasoning, and procedural expertise.  Case in Point Paralegal Services provides legal representation within its licensed parameters, focusing on strategic positioning, evidence preparation, and compelling advocacy aimed at securing efficient and beneficial resolutions for clients.

AR, BN, CA+|EN, DT, ES, FA, FR, GU, HE, HI
IT, KO, PA, PT, RU, TA, TL, UK, UR, VI, ZH
Send a Message to: Case in Point Paralegal Services

NOTE: Do not send confidential details about your case.  Using this website does not establish a legal-representative/client relationship.  Use the website for your introduction with Case in Point Paralegal Services. 
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address is: 216.73.217.74





Assistive Controls:  |   |  A A A